New Content Coming Soon

Going to have some new content coming up soon!

Open letter to Scott Sunde **Updated**

by Sam
Categories: Commentary
Tags:
Comments: Comments Off
Published on: February 7, 2012

An open letter to Scott Sunde from the Seattle PI. Let’s see if I get a reply…

First, read this article: http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Komen-said-no-to-Planned-Parenthood-but-yes-to-2990641.php

Here is the email send to Mr. Sunde. There is a reply below from Mr. Sunde as well now.

Mr. Sunde,

I read your article on the Susan G. Komen foundation and guns. There are several things in your article that I have a problem with. The first is that women with breast cancer come from all walks of life from house wives to hunters. People that support these women that get breast cancer also come from those same circumstances. But you writing an article that demonizes a pink firearm that gives to the foundation is just as bad as demonizing that pink spatula that you find in your local grocery store. Because I would hope that journalistic integrity is important to you I am positive that if there was a notorious spatula killing your article would have read much differently.

Just because a Walther P-22 was used in the Virginia Tech shootings doesn’t any less demonize the firearm. That is like saying that a majority of accidents on the roadways involve Toyota Camery’s, so it must be the fault of Toyota right? The make and model has nothing to do with actual collision in 99% of the cases out there. Saying that a certain make and model firearm is at fault for a shooting sounds just as silly. Fact is that the human element is the commonality in both of our scenarios. But you leave this part out even though it is the most important part. Why is that? A human being makes decisions to pull out a firearm and use it just as much as a human being makes the decision to merge into another vehicle or run a stop sign. That decision making process is the most important part here, because without an operator, a car just as much as a gun would cease to function.

You also make it sound as if just because the weapon was used at Virginia Tech that SGK Foundation should run screaming from it is also just as silly as the car scenario. Should they, hypothetically, not make a pink Toyota Camery because they are in more collisions then any other car? Or should they do it because the act of one person should not outweigh the benefit to the group.

While I may not entirely agree with how the SGK foundation functions, the fact remains that they do good work in funding research for breast cancer. The ability for anyone, from any walk of life to purchase something that supports a cause that may or may not directly affect them should be a moot point. If someone wants everyone on the range that day to know that they support breast cancer, why should that be taken away from them? Who are you, as a journalist, to judge them for what they want to label and the people that want to support the cause?

I would think that you would be in support of them getting every dollar they can to fight such a horrible disease. While I disagree with them pulling the funding from planned parenthood, I wholeheartedly agree with them making anything pink they can to get as much support as they can for their cause. I am glad you don’t like support a cause. What other causes do you not support?

I really would appreciate a response to this email.

Thank You,
Samuel B. Cadle
wagunrights.net

 

So I have now heard back from Scott Sunde at the Seattle PI… Below is his response…

 

Thanks for your note. I wrote the short story because of the context. The Planned Parenthood controversy. Plus, it was a Seattle company.

I never said firearms are wrong or that the foundation shouldn’t lend its name to them. I own some myself.

Firearms, like abortion, is controversial. And owning a gun or having an abortion is also constitutionally protected.

I mentioned Virginia Tech because I did a search on “Walter P-22” and found that link.

He didn’t use any form of salutation, or even put his name on it.  This is the kind of people we call journalists now?  He could not even form a proper email, uses grammatically incorrect English and doesn’t even complete a sentence or thought.  Just WOW………………..

You throw something in an article because you goggled a Walter P-22 and that is what came up?  If I believed everything I read on the web, or took out of context I would never get anything done.  The internet is notorious for inaccurate and erroneous information that is totally pointless.

I put a call into Discount Guns for comment and they pointed me to their open letter and had no comment. But it did sound like they have been receiving a lot of calls on the matter because they definitely sounded like their answer has been rehearsed and used many times.  Their open letter can be found here: http://www.discountgunsales.com/SGKF.pdf

 

Recipe for a Revolution

by Sam
Categories: Uncategorized
Tags: No Tags
Comments: Comments Off
Published on: February 1, 2012

From StormCloudsGathering’s channel.  While I may not agree with all of the information, it is still a reminder that we are in charge, and can still change the course that we are headed down.  As someone who could be called an “enemy combatant” because of my views and the fact that I own weapons, I implore you to at least listen and judge for yourself.  When Senator Graham stands in front of the senate and says “when they say I want my lawyer, you tell them shut up, you don’t get a lawyer, you’re are an enemy combatant.” people need to listen, understand and start taking action before they too are declared an “enemy combatant” and disappear.  This video has been re-uploaded to my youtube channel, found here.

Common Misconceptions on WA Gun laws [Part 1]

by Sam
Categories: Uncategorized
Tags: No Tags
Comments: Comments Off
Published on: February 1, 2012

    There are several misconceptions that I hear every day from people who own guns in Washington State. They range from understandable to wildly dramatic to wanting to straight up smack someone. I am going to attempt to answer some of those questions here. I feel that it is important to not only educate people, but give them the best information possible. First and foremost, working in the firearm industry, and dealing with people that carry on a daily basis I run into a lot of people that don’t even know where they cannot carry a firearm in public. This one always makes me stop and wonder, then how are they carrying and are they not carrying in places that they can, or worse carrying in places off limits by law.

  1. Where Can/Can’t I carry a firearm

This question is easiest to answer by covering the “cannot” side of things. Places that are off limits to a firearm are pretty black and white here in Washington State. The RCW for this is 9.41.300 and it covers all the places that you are prohibited from carrying a weapon, with the exception of one.

  • Restricted access portion of a jail or police department.
    • Anyplace used for the confinement of a prisoner. These are not common access areas.
  • Court Houses, which defines any place there are court proceedings and areas used to conduct court business.
    • Courts are supposed to, by law, have lock boxes or a means of checking a legally carried firearm.
  • Restricted areas of mental health facilities.
  • Any place that is posted with liquor control board signage prohibiting minors.
    • This does not include restaurants that serve alcohol, just the bar portion. You may carry a weapon into someplace like Red Robin or Applebee’s and sit in the restaurant portion.
  • Secure area of airports. So any place past the screening point is a no-go. Anyplace before the security checkpoints is ok, like check in area, baggage claim, parking garage etc….
  • Schools buildings or places designated solely for a school function.
    • So if the school rents out the aquarium for a dance, and the general public is excluded from entry, then carry would be prohibited. If there is just a field trip and the aquarium is still open to the public, carry would be allowed.
    • With a valid Washington State CPL you can carry while dropping off a student at school, and lock a firearm in your car (glove box, lock box) out of sight on school grounds.
  • Federal Buildings.

These are the places that you cannot carry a firearm. Any place else that you come across is ok. Parks and municipal buildings sometimes will have no firearm signs, but because of 9.41.290 (State Preemption) you can carry a firearm there without breaking any laws, as long as they are not one of the prohibited places. Private business will also put up no-firearms signs, other times they will not put up signs, but make policy on the fly. A private business in Washington State can only ask you to leave if you are discovered to have a firearm. At that point, if you refuse you can be trespassed and charged, with trespassing, not a weapons violation. I will delve into state preemption soon, as it will take up its own blog post or two. Stay tuned if you are looking for more information on state preemption.

 

  1. A gun purchased is registered to me! If I buy a firearm from someone I need to register it!

This is a pretty common misconception. First, let me put it like this. WASHINGTON STATE DOES NOT HAVE A REGISTRATION. There, now that’s out there. This really end up being a two prong misconception. If you buy a hand gun from a Federal Firearms Licensed dealer, you will fill out a pistol transfer form. This form is required by the state to transfer the pistol to you. It is not putting the gun in your name. It is not a registration.

Many times I also hear people say “if my gun is stolen, it’s tied to me if the commit a crime.” While this is not only untrue, it is a misconception that the gun is tied to you. Yes, if the ATF can look up the serial number it will show as sold to you by a FFL because your name and the serial number are on the Form 4473. If you had a gun stolen, I would hope that you would have filed a police report stating that. This is your best defense against the ATF if they were to knock on your door. The best way to deal with that is to step outside, shut the door to your house. Advise them that you can talk to them outside, and they are not welcome to come in without a warrant. At that time tell them the firearm was stolen on ____ date. Advise them you have a police report stating as such. Go back inside, ALONE, get the police report and produce it for them. Do not let them take it, if you have the ability, make them a copy. If not, they can write down the case number and get their own copy of the report. Giving them your copy means that you will now have to get another copy, which can take time and during this time you have no report showing the firearm was stolen. This will satisfy their inquiry into the weapon, and will not hear from them again about the matter.

On the other side of this is selling and purchasing firearms private party. In Washington State you can sell a firearm to anyone that is legally able to possess a firearm at any time, for any amount of money. So that shotgun you bought last year and never used? You can sell that to someone and make some money out of it. The easiest way to do this is to ask them to see their CPL if they have one. While not required, it will give you peace of mind that they are allowed to possess a weapon. Many people will also do a bill of sale with the seller’s info, buyer’s info and firearm info. This will go into their records just in case the ATF was ever to knock on their door about the firearm. Again, this is not required to sell a firearm to a private party. Once the firearm is sold, you are done. Keep in mind here, you cannot go to a police station to have them transfer the weapon. The police will not run the other person or the firearm for you. Not only is it a waste of their time, it is also illegal for them to do. Another thing to keep in mind is that a gun store will not do the paperwork for you. They have a business to run, and are not interested in getting involved in private party transfers.

While not something that I advocate, there is a Washington Department of Licensing form that you can fill out that is called a Pistol/Revolver Private Disposition/Transfer. You can fill this out, have both partied sign it and mail it is. This form is voluntary, and does not need to be filled out as there is not necessarily a record of you buying the handgun in the first place. Many people that deal in firearms choose to keep the government out of their lives and gun safes. I will never buy a firearm from anyone that will be requiring a transfer form to mail in, period…end of story. There are plenty of other guns out there with reasonable people selling them that don’t need to get everyone and their cousin involved with the sale of a firearm.

Stay tuned for more WA State firearm myths that I see and deal with quite often…. Including open carry, carrying a firearm in your car and state preemption as well as many more! If you have a topic or question or misconception that you get send it my way and I will research and put up a blog post about it!

Anti-Gun Rhetoric Pointed at Starbucks… Again…

Earlier this week the National Gun Victims Action Council, based out of Chicago Illinois released a statement asking to boycott Starbucks on Feb 14th 2012. I do not usually pander to the far leaning anti-gun lobby, but something about this whole crusade bothered me.

First, let’s look at the facts. Starbucks landed in the middle of a political mess in January 30, 2010 when two other bay area chains had refused service to people that were following California law and openly carrying unloaded handguns. The group from opencarry.org moved on to another coffee house in the area, which happened to be Starbucks. When the media got wind of this, they quickly turned it into a heated political debate. CEO Howard Shultz was in the middle of a debate, that he really had no intention of being in. What happened next, shocked just about everyone around the county, when Starbucks decided that they would follow state law where the store was located. So if you are allowed to open carry in your state, Starbucks wasn’t going to stop you from coming in their store.

To the dismay of the anti-gun groups, people were now allowed to carry a handgun into Starbucks, and would not be challenged by the staff there. There have been numerous letters, appeals and Starbucks refuses to budge on this subject. They are private company, and should not be forced into what others think they should do. Why do we as a nation still feel the need to make property owners do what we want, and business owners bow to us? Starbucks profits are up 10% last quarter again, so obviously they are doing something right. If you don’t like their policy on something, easy enough, don’t patronize their store. There are plenty of stores I no longer patronize because I don’t like their policy on something. That doesn’t mean that I will get national groups to pressure them and then boycott them when they don’t comply with my request. I am free to take my money where I want, and so is everyone else out there. I am sure that there is not a lack of coffee shops that someone can patronize if they don’t like Starbucks policies.

    The rhetoric is also being piled on high for this one. National Gun Victims Action Council claims to represent 40million people all over the county. Only 99, at last count, of those 40million people have cared enough about the movememt to like them on facebook. That math works out to 0.0000025% of their membership, or right around 1 in 400,000 that felt the need to hit the like button. There are also a number of false claims they make, such as the picture of the FiveseveN with a caption of “Capable of penetrating a cop’s vest.” This is a lie, and they know it. The only way that a FiveseveN is going to penetrate a soft armor vest is with armor piercing rounds, which I might add are illegal in the US. They claim that just by being in a state that allows concealed carry or open carry that you are at risk. They claim that a glock is to blame for shooting 31 rounds in 15 seconds, killing 6 and injuring 14. They blame the gun, they blame the “lack of laws.” No one blames the person that pulled the trigger. The rhetoric goes on. If you want to read more rhetoric then you will find in a presidential campaign read for yourselves, here

Let’s support Starbucks this Feb 14th. There are several pages and facebook groups to do that now. At the bottom of this post I will have a list. Let’s finally show the anti-gun crowd what we are really made of, let’s support Starbucks. If you can open carry in your state (and feel comfortable doing so) then open carry to your local Starbucks and show your support. I will be there, at least a few times that day to show my support with my Sig on my hip for all to see.

NYPD Body Scanners, The end of the 4th Amendment?

by Sam
Categories: Commentary
Comments: Comments Off
Published on: January 20, 2012

The latest buzz is that the NYDP is testing these new body scanners to be able to stay in their car, and scan people for weapons.  Why?  Because they feel that it will help them to locate illegal guns on people from across the street and stop and detain them and get the gun off the street and to cut their stop-and-frisk numbers by 500,000 per year! Sounds great right? Not so much…

From New York Post:

                The war on illegal guns is going high-tech.

NYPD cops, without stepping out of their vehicles, may soon be able to detect if someone is packing heat — using technology that could greatly reduce the number of stop-and-frisk searches.

 

Let me say this, I totally disagree with NY and their gun laws there, and this technology brings a whole new meaning to illegal search and seizure.  What happens when these scanners make their way to places like Arizona where there is constitutional carry, or even to my home state of Washington State?  Do I now run the risk while legally carrying that I am going to be searched without cause, stopped at gun point all so the cop can find out if I am a felon and if I am carrying my firearm legally?  This is preposterous.  I am afforded a constitutional right against illegal search and seizure, and the courts here have already ruled that the mere presence of a weapon does not give law enforcement reasonable suspicion to conduct a terry stop on someone.   I know that many other states out there are the same way.  I open carry, and have for years.  Just because I carry a weapon, it doesn’t make me a bad guy or a target for law enforcement.

NYPD Scanner Demo//NYPD File Photo

Citizens of NY that can legally posses a firearm will have to endure constant harassment, being held at gun point and the remote possibility of an officer shooting them.  Anytime you are pointing a gun at someone, you run the risk of being shot, especially when that someone is a police officer.  NYPD already leads the nation in stop-and-frisks with about 600,000 per year,  which alone is bad enough, now that can violate you from across the street without you even knowing that you have been violated, and not having the names of the officers for any sort of recourse.  At least with a stop-and-frisk there is a log of it happening (hopefully) and you can get the names of the officers that stopped you to file a complaint with their precinct or with the courts later.  This idea that Americans are subjects that the police can do whatever they want with needs to stop.   What will happen if the senate does pass HB822 passes and King Obama decides to sign the bill into law?   When it goes into effect I can now carry in all 50 states with my Washington State CPL.  By going to New York do I have to give up some of my rights because I am following the law?  Do I have to be subjected to their police state and treated like a criminal just because I am legally carrying a firearm?  This idea that people need to just submit, and let themselves be subject to things like this is very troublesome to me and should be to the rest of you out there trying to keep what right you do have left from being violated.  Just because something sounds like a great idea, that doesn’t make it right and things like this need to be stopped before they even get off the ground.

 

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories
Welcome , today is Sunday, May 20, 2012